Difference between revisions of "Recommended Reading"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (explanation added) |
m (move) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200704/social-networking "The Web 2.0 Bubble" - article by The Atlantic] | * [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200704/social-networking "The Web 2.0 Bubble" - article by The Atlantic] | ||
* [http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10063020-2.html "11 troubled Web companies" - article by CNet] | * [http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10063020-2.html "11 troubled Web companies" - article by CNet] | ||
* [http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/07/web-20-bubble-bursting-peerflix-cuts-workforce-carnage-mounting-elsewhere/ "Web 2.0 bubble bursting" - article at VentureBeat] | |||
New page, please add content --[[User:Ross|Ross]] 16:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | New page, please add content --[[User:Ross|Ross]] 16:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:57, 12 January 2009
Web 2.0 Bubble?
It seems like the 2.0 bubble is a bit more resilient than the 1.0 bubble. The name might not be as apt, but the sites could be doomed to suffer the same fate as their forebears due to the recession. The articles below are useful because they make a head-count and attempt to survey the situation.
- "Second dot-com bubble" - article at Wikipedia
- "The Web 2.0 Bubble" - article by The Atlantic
- "11 troubled Web companies" - article by CNet
- "Web 2.0 bubble bursting" - article at VentureBeat
New page, please add content --Ross 16:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)