Difference between revisions of "Alive... OR ARE THEY"

From Archiveteam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
* '''[[Friendfeed]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.friendfeed.com/}}) is a happy clam who recently shacked up with Facebook.
* '''[[Friendfeed]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.friendfeed.com/}}) is a happy clam who recently shacked up with Facebook.
* '''[[Google]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.google.com/}}) wants you to think they will be here forever.
* '''[[Google]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.google.com/}}) wants you to think they will be here forever.
* '''[[IFTTT]]''' ({{url|1=http://ifttt.com/}}) is still growing.
* '''[[Infoanarchy]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.infoanarchy.org/}}) The site is functioning again. Might be worth backing up, though. For months, a simple database error that could be fixed with one command KO'd this site unexpectedly with a wealth of P2P information lost. [http://eng.anarchopedia.org/infoAnarchy]  The site was down for four days in June 2010. There is now an archive of the '''content''' at: [http://mirrors.sdboyd56.com/infoanarchy infoAnarchy wiki archive]
* '''[[Infoanarchy]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.infoanarchy.org/}}) The site is functioning again. Might be worth backing up, though. For months, a simple database error that could be fixed with one command KO'd this site unexpectedly with a wealth of P2P information lost. [http://eng.anarchopedia.org/infoAnarchy]  The site was down for four days in June 2010. There is now an archive of the '''content''' at: [http://mirrors.sdboyd56.com/infoanarchy infoAnarchy wiki archive]
* '''[[Internet Archive]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.archive.org/}}) seems stable at the moment but its 2 petabytes of data aren't mirrored anywhere else, the code for their system isn't open source and generally they're a single point of failure for a large amount of the web's history. Why should there be only 1 internet archive?
* '''[[Internet Archive]]''' ({{url|1=http://www.archive.org/}}) seems stable at the moment but its 2 petabytes of data aren't mirrored anywhere else, the code for their system isn't open source and generally they're a single point of failure for a large amount of the web's history. Why should there be only 1 internet archive?

Revision as of 03:16, 23 May 2013

Like many sites before them, these places indicate a sunny outlook, a clean bill of health and a total sense of "all systems go". But as we've found out from those many sites before them, fortunes can change overnight.

Archive Team considers these sites specifically of interest because they solicit so much content, contain so many works and projects by a wide group of people, or have the internet particularly dependent on them. Consider this a fire drill.. know what you can do to get your data off these sites and back them off for later.

Sites