Difference between revisions of "Audit2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(more obvious statuses) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
!Cross-references | !Cross-references | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Example item || [https://archive.org/search.php?query=subject:Archiveteam subject:Archiveteam] || | | Example item || [https://archive.org/search.php?query=subject:Archiveteam subject:Archiveteam] || '''Yes''', already good || '''Yes''', added to the Example category || '''No''', description has no link to the rest of the collection | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 00:13, 16 July 2014
We've uploaded a bunch of stuff: https://archive.org/search.php?query=subject:Archiveteam
Let's go through the list and make sure it's categorized, has decent metadata, etc.
Many of our uploads are quite large, and have been broken into many items on Archive.org. We'll group them together here and verify each set all at once.
Things to check
- Description
- Can a visitor figure out what each item represents?
- Categorization
- Can a visitor find the item by browsing categories?
- Cross-references
- Can a visitor find other items in a set, starting at any item in the set? Can a visitor find the index of a large set starting from any part of it?
- Your suggestion here
- this is just off the top of my head.
Record
Item | Link/Search Criteria | Description | Categorization | Cross-references |
---|---|---|---|---|
Example item | subject:Archiveteam | Yes, already good | Yes, added to the Example category | No, description has no link to the rest of the collection |