Difference between revisions of "Recommended Reading"

From Archiveteam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
* [http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10063020-2.html "11 troubled Web companies" - article by CNet]
* [http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10063020-2.html "11 troubled Web companies" - article by CNet]
* [http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/07/web-20-bubble-bursting-peerflix-cuts-workforce-carnage-mounting-elsewhere/ "Web 2.0 bubble bursting" - article at VentureBeat]
* [http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/07/web-20-bubble-bursting-peerflix-cuts-workforce-carnage-mounting-elsewhere/ "Web 2.0 bubble bursting" - article at VentureBeat]
== Articles of Interest ==
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jan/25/preserving-digital-archive Websites 'must be saved for history' - The Guardian]


== Online Archives of Interest ==
== Online Archives of Interest ==

Revision as of 15:16, 26 January 2009

Closer to the top are links to sites directly related to Archive Team projects and Internet preservation, while links towards the bottom are more general. There is also a Newsfeed of articles where people go off on the need to back up your stuff or issues Archive Team likes you to know about.

Web 2.0 Bubble?

It seems like the 2.0 bubble is a bit more resilient than the 1.0 bubble. The name might not be as apt, but the sites could be doomed to suffer the same fate as their forebears due to the recession. These articles are useful because they make a head-count and attempt to survey the situation.

Articles of Interest

Online Archives of Interest


New page, please add content --Ross 16:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)