Difference between revisions of "Talk:YouTube"

From Archiveteam
Jump to: navigation, search
(youtube2internearchive)
(youtube2internearchive)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Is it really necessary to explicitly call best A/V when youtube-dl it by default?  
 
Is it really necessary to explicitly call best A/V when youtube-dl it by default?  
  
Also, why not embed the subs and thumbnail (note: this is currently broken for thumbnails but I've made a bug report on github about it) instead of make a separate file? Also why not xattrs for those of us with unix filesystems? Xattrs is only one extra flag.  
+
Also, why not embed the subs and thumbnail instead of make a separate file? Also why not xattrs for those of us with unix filesystems? Xattrs is only one extra flag.  
  
 
My command is currently  
 
My command is currently  

Revision as of 02:32, 30 May 2015

youtube2internearchive

https://code.google.com/p/emijrp/ contained a script which also handled upload to Internet Archive, but I can't find it any longer. --Nemo 06:28, 26 January 2015 (EST)

I've found something with Google. bzc6p (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2015 (EST)

Is it really necessary to explicitly call best A/V when youtube-dl it by default?

Also, why not embed the subs and thumbnail instead of make a separate file? Also why not xattrs for those of us with unix filesystems? Xattrs is only one extra flag.

My command is currently

youtube-dl -t --embed-subs --add-metadata --xattrs --console-title --embed-thumbnails

although I'm going to be incorporating elements from the suggested one into mine. The reasoning behind this is it's one file to send. That command is how I archive currently, it's changing though.

I'd appreciate hearing your input about why I may be wrong though. Thanks in advance,

--Vxbinaca 21:24, 29 May 2015 (EDT)